Cross-Sector entity

Endangered Species Act

legislation
6.7

Antonin Scalia is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 2 of the 3 tracked stories. The 140-day window averages about 0.2 stories each week. The busiest single day carried 2. Coverage clusters in regulation, which accounts for 2 of those 3, with the remainder spread across 1 other category.

3 verified stories tracked

Last mentioned: Jul 15, 2026

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Endangered Species Act

3 stories
6.7 avg impact
0% positive
0% negative
  • 100% neutral

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Endangered Species Act

Antonin Scalia is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 2 of the 3 tracked stories. The 140-day window averages about 0.2 stories each week. The busiest single day carried 2. Coverage clusters in regulation, which accounts for 2 of those 3, with the remainder spread across 1 other category. Each carries 2 original sources on average. Endangered Species Act appears in 3 tracked Cross-Sector stories published from February 26, 2026 through July 15, 2026.

Stories tracked
3
Per week
0.2
Sources per story
2

Computed from the 3 stories linked to this entity. Beat comparisons are omitted because no baseline was available for this window.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Endangered Species Act. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Timeline

  1. Effective Date

    The rescission takes effect; 'harm' no longer includes indirect habitat modification.

  2. Final Rule Published in Federal Register

    FWS and NMFS formally publish the final rescission rule, triggering 60-day effective countdown.

  3. Joint Announcement

    U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Department of Commerce announce final rule rescinding the 'harm' definition.

  4. Proposed Rule Released

    FWS and NMFS publish proposed rule to rescind the 'harm' definition, initiating public comment period.

  5. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Decision

    Supreme Court upholds regulatory 'harm' definition including habitat modification; Justice Scalia files dissent.

Stories mentioning Endangered Species Act 3

Biotech pharma Neutral 7

Biotech's ESA Burden Lifted? 'Harm' Rule Ends in 60 Days, Easing Facility Permits

The rescission of the ESA's 'harm' definition removes a major regulatory hurdle for biotech and pharma facility construction near sensitive habitats. Starting September 12, 2026, indirect habitat impacts will no longer trigger 'take' liability, potentially accelerating project timelines and reducing permitting costs for life-science companies.

2 sources
Legal regulation Neutral 7

ESA 'Harm' Rule Gone: Agencies Adopt Scalia Dissent, Effective Sept. 12, 2026

Federal agencies have finalized the rescission of the Endangered Species Act's 'harm' definition, replacing it with Justice Scalia's dissent interpretation. This dramatically narrows what constitutes a prohibited 'take' and eliminates indirect habitat liability, creating significant legal uncertainty and anticipated litigation from conservation groups.

2 sources

Source: National Law Review · National Law Review

Climate regulation Neutral 6

Federal Judge Mandates Operational Shifts at Columbia and Snake River Dams

A federal court has ordered immediate operational changes to the Columbia and Snake River dam systems to prioritize the survival of endangered salmon populations. The ruling forces a critical trade-off between the Pacific Northwest's hydroelectric output and its legal obligations under the Endangered Species Act.

2 sources