Cross-Sector entity

Federal Court of Australia

Company
5.6

Of the tracked stories, 2 of 7 also mention ASIC, the most common co-covered peer. That works out to roughly 0.3 stories per week across a 154-day span. The busiest single day carried 2. regulation accounts for 4 of the 7 tracked stories, while 3 other categories carry the remainder.

7 verified stories tracked

Last mentioned: Jul 28, 2026

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Federal Court of Australia

7 stories
5.6 avg impact
0% positive
29% negative

Coverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 29 percentage points.

  • 71% neutral
  • 29% negative

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Federal Court of Australia

Of the tracked stories, 2 of 7 also mention ASIC, the most common co-covered peer. That works out to roughly 0.3 stories per week across a 154-day span. The busiest single day carried 2. regulation accounts for 4 of the 7 tracked stories, while 3 other categories carry the remainder. 29% of these stories carry negative sentiment. The tracked stories average 2.9 original sources each. We currently track 7 Cross-Sector stories that mention Federal Court of Australia, published between February 25, 2026 and July 28, 2026.

Stories tracked
7
Per week
0.3
Negative
29%
Sources per story
2.9

Computed from the 7 stories linked to this entity. Beat comparisons are omitted because no baseline was available for this window.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Federal Court of Australia. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Timeline

  1. Appeal hearing begins

    A four-day hearing commences in Melbourne, arguing the government set an unambitious and unfair emissions target.

  2. Regional Report Launch

    Major Australian regional outlets publish findings on women judges holding the line against the justice gap.

  3. Final Ruling

    The Federal Court of Australia rules in favor of the designer, confirming infringement.

  4. Court Dismissal

    Federal Court dismisses ASIC's case against the directors, citing insufficient evidence of personal breach.

  5. ASIC Warning

    ASIC Chair Joe Longo issues a statement placing all corporate boards 'on notice' regarding diligence standards.

  6. Federal Court Ruling

    Justice Lee declares Bekier and Martin breached their duties in a landmark judgment.

  7. Profit Impact

    Woolworths reports a 50% drop in half-year profit to account for the $710M remediation provision.

  8. Court Ruling

    The court issues a final determination on the scale of back pay and interest owed.

  9. Federal Court rules against islanders

    Justice Wigney accepts climate impacts but dismisses case, finding policy decisions immune from negligence law.

  10. International Day of Women Judges

    Global focus on judicial diversity and its impact on the rule of law.

  11. License Suspension

    Star's casino licenses remain suspended or under management as remediation continues.

  12. ASIC Proceedings Launched

    ASIC initiates civil penalty proceedings against 11 directors for breach of duty.

  13. High Court Parity

    Justice Stephen Gageler sworn in as Chief Justice, maintaining gender parity on the High Court bench.

  14. Bell Inquiry Report

    Star Entertainment found unfit to hold a casino license in NSW due to systemic failures.

  15. ASIC Lawsuit

    ASIC commences civil penalty proceedings against Matthias Bekier, Paula Martin, and nine others.

  16. Legal Proceedings

    Protracted litigation in the Federal Court regarding the definition of 'reasonable additional hours'.

  17. Federal Court proceedings launched

    Elders Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai file suit against the Commonwealth, seeking orders to cut emissions.

  18. NAB Deception

    Star provides misleading information to NAB regarding the use of China UnionPay cards for gambling.

  19. Initial Disclosure

    Woolworths first reveals underpayment of salaried staff during a review of its payroll systems.

  20. Lawsuit Filed

    Katie Taylor initiates formal infringement proceedings in the Federal Court.

Stories mentioning Federal Court of Australia 7

Finance regulation Neutral 6

ASIC Defeat in Star Entertainment Case Sets New Bar for Board Accountability

The Federal Court has dismissed ASIC’s civil penalty proceedings against former directors of Star Entertainment Group, marking a significant legal setback for the regulator. However, ASIC maintains the case has clarified the high standards of diligence expected of corporate boards, effectively placing directors across Australia on notice.

2 sources
Legal regulation Negative 6

Federal Court Finds Ex-Star CEO and GC Breached Duties Over 'Unethical' Culture

The Federal Court of Australia has ruled that former Star Entertainment Group CEO Matthias Bekier and General Counsel Paula Martin breached their corporate duties by failing to disclose significant criminal risks and misleading lenders. Justice Michael Lee described the company's culture as 'dysfunctional and unethical' in a landmark 501-page decision.

2 sources

Source: Miklos Bolza (au) · Miklos Bolza (au)

HR & Workforce compensation Negative 6

Woolworths Profit Halved by Landmark $710M Back Pay Court Ruling

Woolworths Group has seen its first-half profit cut in half following a major court ruling requiring the retailer to pay $710 million in back pay, interest, and taxes. The decision stems from long-standing underpayment issues regarding salaried staff and 'reasonable' additional hours.

2 sources