Last mentioned: Mar 11, 2026
Final Ruling
The Federal Court of Australia rules in favor of the designer, confirming infringement.
Profit Impact
Woolworths reports a 50% drop in half-year profit to account for the $710M remediation provision.
Court Ruling
The court issues a final determination on the scale of back pay and interest owed.
Legal Proceedings
Protracted litigation in the Federal Court regarding the definition of 'reasonable additional hours'.
Initial Disclosure
Woolworths first reveals underpayment of salaried staff during a review of its payroll systems.
Lawsuit Filed
Katie Taylor initiates formal infringement proceedings in the Federal Court.
Initial Conflict
Katy Perry's legal team attempts to block the designer's trademark use.
Trademark Registration
Taylor successfully registers 'Katie Perry' as a trademark in Australia.
Brand Launch
Katie Taylor begins selling clothes under the Katie Perry label in Australia.
The Federal Court of Australia has ruled in favor of local fashion designer Katie Perry in a long-running trademark dispute against pop star Katy Perry. The decision affirms the priority of local trademark registrations over global celebrity status, finding the singer's merchandise infringed on the designer's established brand.
The Federal Court of Australia has dismissed ASIC's high-stakes civil penalty proceedings against former directors and officers of Star Entertainment Group. Despite the legal setback, the regulator maintains that the case serves as a critical warning to corporate boards regarding their oversight responsibilities.
Woolworths Group has seen its first-half profit cut in half following a major court ruling requiring the retailer to pay $710 million in back pay, interest, and taxes. The decision stems from long-standing underpayment issues regarding salaried staff and 'reasonable' additional hours.