Last mentioned: Mar 12, 2026
Mandatory Review
The deadline for the first formal six-year joint review of the CUSMA agreement.
Refund Ruling
Judge rules that companies are entitled to refunds due to procedural failures by the USTR.
Court Tariff Decision
A judicial ruling offers 'small wins' for businesses by limiting specific tariff applications.
Lobbying Surge
Major industry groups begin formalizing positions ahead of the 2026 review.
Auto Rules Ruling
A dispute panel rules against the U.S. interpretation of automotive rules of origin.
Mass Litigation Begins
Thousands of companies file suits in the Court of International Trade.
CUSMA Implementation
The agreement officially replaces NAFTA as the governing trade framework.
List 4A Tariffs
Tariffs imposed on an additional $120B of Chinese imports, including consumer goods.
List 3 Tariffs
U.S. imposes 10% tariffs on $200B of Chinese goods, later raised to 25%.
The United States has launched initial proceedings to establish a new framework for global trade penalties, targeting international market distortions. This move signals a strategic shift toward more aggressive trade enforcement, necessitating significant updates to corporate compliance and RegTech monitoring systems.
The U.S. Court of International Trade has ruled that thousands of companies are entitled to refunds for tariffs paid under Section 301. This decision could trigger billions of dollars in repayments to retailers and e-commerce giants who have been battling the levies since 2018.
While a recent court decision has provided targeted relief from specific tariffs, North American businesses remain on high alert as the 2026 CUSMA review approaches. The legal victory offers a tactical win for industry players amidst a climate of significant trade uncertainty and potential protectionist shifts.